Bork the TSA

Politics and religion.

Moderator: JasonNC


Snarky!
Posts: 13685
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:01 pm
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:03 pm
No, really.

What the heck is up with these people? What's next? I assume we'll have to strip, get a cavity search, and then put on TSA-supplied uniforms to fly.

Booyah to Ron Paul.

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/videoLibrary ... =599164944
Quote
User avatar
AJ Research Dept
Posts: 2879
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:14 am
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:54 pm
I couldn't get the vid. Found the link at Prisonplanet.com

"Enough is enough!" - Ron Paul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-N5adYM ... r_embedded

Awesome speech for a guy in his 70s

He says that every single member of Congress and every member of the Executive branch should get a naked body scan and then groped down their pants, and maybe they might re-evaluate.

He says the greatest safety measure is already in place: to give the trusted, respected pilots some freakin guns and lockable doors! Obviously a commonsensical choice. Undercover marshals on flights -- with guns -- are obviously another measure, in place now, that works just fine.


For anyone who argues, and says "OMG, but there's underwear bombers! How can good guys with guns stop that?" You know my answer to that. The US, British, and Dutch governments KNEW the underwear bomber was on the terrorist watch list, KNEW his visa was expired, and yet unnamed powers in the US intel apparatus PURPOSEFULLY allowed the bomber to fly anyway. They allowed that guy on, with full knowledge he represented a danger.This was proven by a House Committee investigation.
Quote
User avatar
AJ Research Dept
Posts: 2879
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:14 am
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 10:14 pm
The district attorney’s office in San Mateo County, California has promised to follow up any complaints of over the top TSA pat-downs with prosecutions on the charge of sexual battery, reports ABC 7 News.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/district-at ... opers.html

Woman from Amarillo, TX, sexually dehumanized. Lawsuit starts.
http://amarillo.com/news/local-news/201 ... h-indecent

On FOX news, Ohio mother with child claims to be sexually assaulted by TSA worker
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm9_Pt0f ... r_embedded

Man claims Charlotte TSA employee groped his 6-year-old son
http://www.wbtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=13526724#

CNN - pilot files lawsuit over tsa body scanners
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXIGw9QG ... _embedded#!

Not only is former Bush stooge Chertoff making money from these indecent new security measures, so is Obama-friendly George Soros:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opini ... z15W2t9Hoa


This video is the most important and disturbing one. CW39 News in Tennessee shows a 3 yr old girl being molested by a TSA employee.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/shocker-tsa ... years.html

Is the TSA allowing convicted rapists to perform pat-down searches?
http://www.airsafenews.com/2010/11/is-t ... ts-to.html

Wtf is this?
Quote

Snarky!
Posts: 13685
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:01 pm
PostPosted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:40 am
That 3 year old was clearly a terrorist.

The thing that I didn't even realize until I started researching this stuff is that there's no requirement for airlines to use the TSA; they're welcome to hire their own private security. None of them do, presumably because they don't want to foot the bill, but I have to think that at least part of the reaction to all this news is going to be less people flying, and therefore lower revenue anyway. I know I don't fly anymore.

And I keep wondering what's next. When some nutjob blows up a mall, are we going to have to be strip searched before we can visit CinnaBon?
Quote
User avatar
Has Great Trade Rep
Posts: 3939
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:03 pm
Location: Northern VA
PostPosted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 9:41 am
Cinnabon blows me up in the bathroom anyways
Quote

Snarky!
Posts: 13685
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:01 pm
PostPosted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 10:26 am
So you admit to smuggling explosives in your rectum?

Off to Guantanamo with you!
Quote
User avatar
Has Great Trade Rep
Posts: 3939
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:03 pm
Location: Northern VA
PostPosted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 1:48 pm
http://wdbo.com/localnews/2010/11/sanfo ... ut-of.html
Sanford Airport to opt out of TSA screening

But it doesn't seem that anything changes. So the TSA agents won't be there but

The TSA points out that even if an airport decides to use a private firm for security, the screeners still must follow TSA guidelines. That would include using enhanced pat-downs and the full-body scanners if they are installed at the airport.
Quote
User avatar
Has Great Trade Rep
Posts: 3939
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:03 pm
Location: Northern VA
PostPosted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 1:51 pm
and to interject some levity into the matter:
http://www.mcsweeneys.net/2010/11/18adelman.html
Quote
User avatar
AJ Research Dept
Posts: 2879
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:14 am
PostPosted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:28 pm
Not only are the 'enhanced pat downs' and naked body scanners illegal according to state criminal codes, they are unconstitutional in that they directly conflict with the 4th Amendment. So the Federal government, without any exaggeration, is against both the states and the Constitution, in their mandates to preserve good order and rights.

And I can't stress this enough: We are told that a big reason for these security measures is because of the Underwear bomber of Dec 2009. Which was most likely an invented fake crisis.

Can someone do a simple google search for me? All you have to do is find official statements from members of the House of Congress publicly declaring that their investigation found elements of the US intel apparatus purposefully allowed the Underwear Bomber on the plane, with the full knowledge he represented a potentially lethal danger. To make it even worse, law enforcement, State Department, and CIA noteworthies have publicly backed up this fact with their own testimonies recorded in some newspapers.

It's so in your face, yet from the corporate press as a whole, there is just a staggering silence.
Quote
User avatar
AJ Research Dept
Posts: 2879
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:14 am
PostPosted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:40 pm
While you're at it, simply do an internet search on the "Liquid Bombers' from Britain. A parade of explosive experts in Britain said that no such bomb could be smuggled on or detonated, unless the terrorists had access to top-of-the-line special ops materials and serious military knowledge. Which they didn't. These Liquid bombers were just working class stiffs, who were more interested in helping their dad deliver pastries. In other words, they were patsies.

It's about as dangerous as the 'Ricin bombers' or the Fort Hood pizza bombers or the JFK bomber or the Liberty 7 homeless bombers or the Bronx bombers. All made-up nonsense.
Quote
Next

Return to It matters!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron