I'm hesitant to call it the "Syrian" refugee crisis because I am unsure as to whether the majority of refugees from the Syrian civil war have in fact left the Middle East for Europe. They seem to have mainly fled to several countries adjacent to Syria.

The refugees are increasingly referred to as "migrants", and then broken into two main groups: war refugee and economic migrant. There is a large bloc of economic migrants from at least two dozen countries in Asia and Africa.

Below is a random look at some migrant groups on the move. Watch this video closely for a sample of what Europe is dealing with:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2GSp_BNkSY

Weapons of Mass Migration

There is a growing sense among researchers that the current 'refugee crisis' has in fact been knowingly generated, steered, and nurtured by several powerful groups working in unison. In other words, this event is not an organic, random problem created by a series of unfortunate coincidences. Powerful state actors, directly shaping outcomes, have been involved in the crisis from the beginning.


For many examples of how planned state-controlled "mass migration" occurs, refer to the following essay.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/s ... clnk&gl=ca

Weapons of Mass Migration, part 2

https://willyloman.wordpress.com/2015/1 ... -campaign/


It turns out that Professor Greenhill, the author of 'Weapons of Mass Migration', is a serious academic insider in deep with the globalist tax-free foundations, CIA, and Pentagon. She writes:

This article focuses on a very particular nonmilitary method of applying coercive pressure—the use of migration and refuge e crises as instruments of persuasion“…

“Coercive engineered migrations (or coercion-driven migrations ) are “those cross-border population movements that are deliberately created or manipulated in order to induce political, military and/or economic concessions from a target state or states.”…

“Coercive engineered migration is frequently, but not always, undertaken in the context of population outflows strategically generated for other reasons. In fact, it represents just one subset of a broader class of events that all rely on the creation and exploitation of such crises as means to political and military ends—a phenomenon I call strategic engineered migration” Kelly Greenhill

Comment from Creighton:

These Weapons of Mass Migration campaigns produce a myriad of potentially positive and profitable outcomes for the elites who like to conduct them. Very rarely are the results positive for either the populations of the targeted nations or the refugees themselves.

The most useful result of this destabilization campaign may just be a variation on the old “divide and conquer” trick. Let’s go back to the Ford Foundation expert for more on that:

Greenhill:

“Like immigration and refugee policy more generally, real and threatened migration crises tend to split societies into (at least) two mutually antagonistic and often highly mobilized groups: the pro- refugee/migrant camp and anti-refugee/migrant camp” Kelly Greenhill

Creighton:

In that section of her paper, Greenhill carefully explains how the planners of these Weapons of Mass Migration campaigns understand and manipulate both the anti-refugee camps as well as the pro-refugee camps. They do this in order to drive emotional wedges between the population of the targeted countries. Between each other and between the people and the elites who rule them. Her evaluation of it is extremely well documented.

People have been asking themselves why plant fake Syrian passports when they staged the recent false flag event in Paris. At first glance it would seem counter-intuitive in that it doesn’t help with their campaign to force the refugees on the various countries across Europe and here in the states. For a while, I didn’t really understand that one myself.

But thanks to Observer posting this link and having read her paper I think it seems likely that they not only wish to impose these millions of refugees on the targeted nations and their citizenry, but they also want there to be as much internal conflict on the issue as possible as they do it. That enables them to further weaken the resolve of the targeted populations and once again, drives them further apart from one another, preventing a coming together on mutually agreeable grounds.

It’s brilliant when you think about it.

Beyond Divide and Conquer

"In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all."
--Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, 1992.

Beyond blogger Creighton's commentary, which is very interesting and praiseworthy, is the larger intention of the globalists. They don't merely seek to divide and conquer average people, by using them against each other, so the elite can better rule and exploit them. Large-scale, somewhat organized migrations cause serious stresses on nation-states, overall economic conditions, and the cultures.

The stated goal of the globalist elite is nothing less than to degrade and shatter nations. It is through this destruction -- either slow or fast, visible or invisible -- that the globalists hope to remake the world.

The finances and individuality of nations must strained. The economic plight of workers stressed. The religions and cultures put against each other, mixed up, and tested.

The goal is to reduce the world into a fragmented ghetto, with a supervisory elite and its new infrastructure eventually in charge. The many nations and civilizations of man must be put into such a state, a Babel state, that they will be unable to coalesce into unified, homogeneous groupings that can defend their individual wealth, and unique lifestyles and beliefs to resist full globalization.

"The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down...but in the end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault."

CFR member Richard Gardner, writing in the April 1974 issue of the CFR's journal, Foreign Affairs.

Good Graces Exploited?

The elites running the European countries have called upon human instincts of empathy and compassion. They've also made appeals to Christian ideals to build popular support for accepting the migrants. Last of all, they've harped on economic and racial guilt.

Unfortunately and ironically, several of these very same elites and their North American counterparts have been instrumental -- in one way or another -- in causing death, destruction, and impoverishment in the areas generating migrants. In other words, several share culpability for causing the crisis to begin with.

Finally, many of these same elites are closet globalists. They are in fact hastening the demise of the nation-states which they have been elected to safeguard. They know, from many past studies, that it is difficult to pay for and sustain such massive immigration, and difficult to achieve cultural integration and high employment.

In the end, they are diminishing what it is to be German, Italian, or Scandinavian, or French, or British, and so on. Nationalism and European culture are going to keep taking hits over the following years. Europe will come to be more of a 'place' where a bunch of working and unemployed people live in the shadow of old cultural-national landmarks that once were of supreme, unifying importance. This Babel land will be divided and unable to generate resistance to the much more organized globalists.

The small country of Hungary has decided to wall itself off from the refugees. Can you blame them?

Example of refugees demanding entry into or passage through Hungary:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQbe4Of9SD4

One will notice, as in the case of many other videos, that most of these migrants are male, and several do not appear to have originated from Syria.

Hungary is a country of roughly 9.9 million, with national territory as large as Indiana. It has a proud history, with state-hood going back to Medieval times; its own unique language not spoken elsewhere; and a Catholic/Democracy/Permissive kind of society.

The millions of migrants wanting to go through Hungary.... Could these people be housed? fed? Employed? Given social assistance? All taught Euro languages and customs? Christianized eventually? Could they be convinced to not care about Sharia?

Hungary wanted no part of it eventually, when the migrants increased their demands and numbers. I can't blame them. Other Balkan countries followed suit, then Poland, and so forth.

Many migrants didn't want to stay in Hungary. The real cake is farther north and west. Among other motivations, there's stories of welfare for life.

Vetted refugees in the US seek to join ISIS.

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2 ... isis-2.php

But it's only a small number. I'm sure they couldn't kill more than a handful of American citizens.

Also, they polled the refugees on a few questions. 19% think America is the "greatest threat", and 33% oppose the idea of destroying ISIS.

http://neoneocon.com/2015/11/28/polling ... -know-you/

I heard a proposal that, rather than bringing refugees here, we set up support there, which makes a ton more sense to me. I suspect people from Syria would rather live somewhere like Syria than in Minnesota or whatever. We'd be helping and not potentially putting American citizens in danger.

Heli wrote:I heard a proposal that, rather than bringing refugees here, we set up support there, which makes a ton more sense to me. I suspect people from Syria would rather live somewhere like Syria than in Minnesota or whatever. We'd be helping and not potentially putting American citizens in danger.

Great idea, except the NATO-Gulf-State-Israel covert program called "let's-create-a-huge-civil-war-in-Syria" has crippled their economy, blown up a million homes, and would require 5-10 years of rebuilding in peacetime to get anywhere near back to normal.

This is why a lot of Middle Easterners have said, "Screw it. They keep wrecking this joint so I might as well go over there, and pretend I'm one of them. They got some sweet welfare too, I heard."

But yeah, if there were reasonable, nationalistic Western leaders not addicted to destroying the Middle East and sending weapons of mass migration back at us, then they would have dealt with President Bashar Assad of Syria in a far more civilized manner. We could have -- gasp -- negotiated for him to share powers, sign treaties, and retool his political arrangements in return for positive incentives. He was very willing. We could have -- gasp -- even befriended Syria because it is an enemy of (our) terrorists. We could have -- gasp -- cooperated with the Russians and made the whole region secure.

But the terrorists.... Yes, our terrorists. And the terrorists of our allies. They're not making things so nice over there. Our governments are now scum because of it. They don't even try to hide their immoral plotting that much anymore. How can you trust your government to "not put American citizens in danger" when they nurture real terrorists?

Heli, I wish your logical idea had been pursued. Stop the war, rebuild. Go home. Instead, it's very clear to me, that our side -- the bad Machiavellian guys -- wants to create maximum chaos: terrorism, mass migration, societal division and collapse, economic implosion, Balkanization. It's what the globalist steamroller does.

There's a steely logic to all of it once people heed the evidence (as opposed to the talk) that it has nothing to do with protecting or helping you or hardly anyone else for that matter. This is a struggle to change and control everything, via the most cost-effective methods possible, just as it was in the 20th and 19th centuries, and so on.

The ongoing flood of non-European migrants into Sweden is creating chaos and dissatisfaction
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-11-3 ... ithout-gun

Sweden says, No more migrants please, after taking in more than they can handle
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... ation.html

More Swedes are voting for anti-immigration political parties, as the depth of the crisis is felt
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/ ... gee-crisis



Sweden, per capita, is now the rape capitol of Europe. Most of the male rapists are not white, native Swedes
http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-new ... orrectness

The politically correct Left and 'most' feminists (besides Wolf) often refuse to discuss this fact. White Swedish men are chided as bad, but Muslim rapists should be ignored or quietly given very short prison sentences.

Per capita, Sweden has 6x the rapes experienced in America. 77.6 percent of the country’s rapists are identified as “foreigners” (and that’s significant because in Sweden, “foreigner” is generally synonymous with "immigrant from Muslim country"). The increase in rape directly coincided with Sweden's 'multicultural' immigration policies, and it began to spike as larger numbers of Muslim men from the Middle East and Africa were brought in during the last decade. As the Swedes try to hide their dirty secret, and shout 'racist!' to any citizens demanding an end to large-scale immigration, some Muslims in Sweden have openly said the Swedish girls deserve it (because they're acting and dressing like any young woman in any Western society).



I'll take a look at some other European countries, and how the politically correct hide the crimes and stresses of too much immigration.

Sweden's unemployment and welfare shock

Sept 2015, pre-refugee crisis

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-de ... e26338254/

Forty-eight per cent of immigrants of working age don’t work.... Even after 15 years in Sweden, their employment rates reach only about 60 per cent. Sweden has the biggest employment gap in Europe between natives and non-natives.

In Sweden, where equality is revered, inequality is now entrenched. Forty-two per cent of the long-term unemployed are immigrants, Mr. Sanandaji said. Fifty-eight per cent of welfare payments go to immigrants. Forty-five per cent of children with low test scores are immigrants. Immigrants on average earn less than 40 per cent of Swedes. The majority of people charged with murder, rape and robbery are either first- or second-generation immigrants. “Since the 1980s, Sweden has had the largest increase in inequality of any country in the OECD,” Mr. Sanandaji said.

Sweden tries to be a social welfare utopia. Billions are redistributed to those who need the support. Massive government industries have been set up to attend to many different needs and to maximize participation in society. You can get a lot of free stuff in Sweden because everyone from birth -- until now -- is part of the society, equal, contributing, sharing the wealth, culture, etc.

It was all working really great until Sweden decided to dramatically increase its population with foreigners from an entirely different kind of culture.

Sweden: One of the worst hit Social Welfare states of the Weapons of Mass Migration. At this rate, they are definitely going down. The globalists don't like European welfare states.

Recommendations:
-immigration intake should be placed at zero.
-current applicants deemed temporary only, with deportation scheduled once other countries accept
-lawbreakers deported
-vocal religious extremists deported
-chronic welfare abusers warned, then deported if fail to accept employment found by govt.