Gaddafi's warnings from the graveColonel Gaddafi warned Tony Blair of Islamist attacks on Europe, phone conversations reveal. Transcripts of two telephone conversations between the two leaders which took place on February 25, 2011, are made public.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politic ... ealed.htmlhttp://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-01-0 ... lair-terroI'd like to read more about Gaddafi, Libya, and its struggles with the Western powers (and the terrorists which those powers support).
Gaddafi is one of the many so-called 'little Hitlers' the USGov named and eventually overthrew. The truth is much more complex, and hardly Hitler-ish. If the War on Terror, and now the War against ISIS, were real, Gaddafi should have been our #1 buddy in North Africa. Gaddafi was both a target of and a sworn enemy of Al Qaeda. Later, his government was the first to fight the Salafists who went on to form ISIS.
Gaddafi, a secular anti-Islamist, warned the West that these bastards were coming for them. Poor Gaddafi found out all too late that the Islamic SOBs in his country and in Syria were in fact funded and controlled by the very same rich white guys he was warning. Irony score = 93 out of a 100.
Why was Gaddafi whacked in 2011? Why did NATO send the terrorists and missiles after him in a mafia-like hit? There's no actual solid proof his govt was involved with the Lockerbie terrorist incident long ago, despite the shaky official stories and Reagan-era fantasies. Gaddafi gave up his WMD program. He gave up spreading around arms in Africa. He got friendlier with most everyone. He got more into handing out money, jobs, and services to his citizens.
Besides fighting against terrorism, racism, sexism, and poverty, Gaddafi engaged in one fight that totally destroyed him and his regime. He had a plan, along with the leaders in Tunisia, to create a new gold based currency for North Africa, with a central bank outside of the influence of the Western banking interests. Not long after these plans were discovered, he was being dragged through the streets in a bloody pulp and the anti-Gaddafi rebels (Salafist terrorists from Benghazi) were setting up a new central bank 100% hooked up with the Western system.
That's the War
of Terror for you. It's not about fighting terrorists or spreading democracy (Libya is currently in complete chaos, rocked by terrorism, and run by Islamic clan nutcases). The War of Terror is the PR gimmick for the Western powers to go ape-shyt on anyone they want to, anytime they want, so their mafia control remains intact. In the case of Libya or Iraq or Syria or Ukraine, they have no interest in taking control or even offering Western rewards and protection. They just destabilize the places and then let them go to hell, while throwing scraps to the chief puppets.
Who's wearing the consequences of the ruination? Mainly common Europeans who never wanted any of this.