Criticism of Climate Change theory

Politics and religion.

Moderator: JasonNC


Bring me all the bacon and eggs you have...
Posts: 5028
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:53 pm
Location: Guess
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:07 pm
HAHAHAHAHA!

I genuinely laughed.
Quote
User avatar
AJ Research Dept
Posts: 2881
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:14 am
PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 11:00 pm
Russia’s Putin Says Global Warming Is ‘A Fraud’

http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/29/russi ... s-a-fraud/

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/ ... GI20151029

The conflict between Russia and the West is almost perfectly diametric. It's been well-known that the Russian scientific position is doubtful of global warming for a while. Plus several Russian scientists have presented proof that oil is abiotic; in other words, they drilled wells so deep that they pre-date the formation of dinosaurs and pre-Cambrian plants, suggesting that oil formed without them. That directly goes against the Peak Oil scare theories put out by the Western (corporate/DC-funded) academics.

I can't support Putin and the Kremlin because I perceive them as good or lawful or logically great. I'm realistic. Russia is a great power with interests to protect and dirty fights to win. Then again, I applaud the Ruskies because they continue to defy every bit of propaganda and trickery the West comes up with. It's refreshing. When psychopathic powers seek to control the whole world, it's nice to see a strong rival show up and wag his finger. Nyet, nyet.

Got to love the contrarians who flip the bird to our controllers. In many Western circles Putin is now more popular than several of our leaders, despite the incessant anti-Putin msgs in the media. It's good irony since Americans once saw communist Russia as the most despicable nation on Earth.
Quote
User avatar
AJ Research Dept
Posts: 2881
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:14 am
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 3:40 pm
Hey! Remember the global cooling??
:shock: :shock: :shock:
Image

In 1974, climate scientists blamed droughts, floods, blizzards, tornadoes, typhoons and hurricanes on global cooling.


Image
Image

Since then, they have erased the post-1945 cooling – and now blame all of those same things on global warming.


Image

Newsweek, April 28, 1975. Click View to enlarge.
Image

Image
Last edited by Dorm on Tue Nov 03, 2015 11:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Quote

Snarky!
Posts: 13692
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:01 pm
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 1:47 pm
Another heretic stoned for daring to question the gospel.

http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/02/ ... orum-gwpf/
Quote

Bring me all the bacon and eggs you have...
Posts: 5028
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:53 pm
Location: Guess
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 6:29 pm
That's crazy!

This information doesn't make it to most people though...
Quote
User avatar
AJ Research Dept
Posts: 2881
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:14 am
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 11:43 pm
Ice wars continue

Antarctica is actually gaining ice, says NASA. Is global warming over?

http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2015/1 ... rming-over

In a paper published in the Journal of Glaciology on Friday, researchers from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, the University of Maryland in College Park, and the engineering firm Sigma Space Corporation offer a new analysis of satellite data that show a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001 in the Antarctic ice sheet.

That gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.


We obviously need more carbon taxes, a cap n trade system run by Goldman Sachs, and mass impoverishment to stop this net gain of polar ice. Err, wait....

Image
Quote
User avatar
AJ Research Dept
Posts: 2881
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:14 am
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 12:08 am
While gullible, well-intentioned Westerners have been mesmerized by the non-crisis of global warming, the media has largely forgotten or played down the biggest environmental problem of our generation.

The fallout from the Fukushima disaster is far from over
http://www.newsweek.com/fukushima-has-b ... 602ffa86e0

http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/03/03/ ... 602ffa86e0

The airborne plumes of radioactivity went worldwide (and apparently continue to gust up from time to time), while the more insidious underwater plumes have spread from coast to coast across the North Pacific over the course of 3 years. If we're lucky, the Fukushima reactors might eventually be contained in the next generation or two. How this will affect the fate of thousands of species, including our own, is still purposefully ignored. Mind you, I'll tell you one precautionary story: take it real easy on Pacific seafood. An intake of zero might be helpful.

Since there's no money in doing anything about it -- no carbon taxes or cap n trade or global government hype -- don't expect Obama or Gore or Hillary to give a rat's ass about the biggest, ongoing radioactive leak ever witnessed by mankind.


Image
Quote

Bring me all the bacon and eggs you have...
Posts: 5028
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:53 pm
Location: Guess
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:18 pm
Sigh...

Someone I worked with saw "Cowspiracy" on Netflix.

We're all gonna die, and it's the meat industry that's doing it. The propaganda is relentless.
Quote
User avatar
AJ Research Dept
Posts: 2881
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:14 am
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 2:30 am
Cowspiracy, lol.

next up...

The countries of Asia, which happen to host 4,164,252,000 people, don't give a rat's ass about global warming. Asian countries desire as many coal plants as they can build

http://www.thegwpf.com/asia-building-50 ... ear-alone/

Guess what? My idiot country of Canada, with its humble population of 35,851,774, is willing to destroy its economy and impoverish its people to cut its CO2 emissions by say 25%, and yet this would have zero ZERO impact, zero relevance, in the face of Asia's growing massive coal burning energy programs.

Canada has far less than 1% of the Asia population, with not many coal burning plants at all, and yet our new prime minister wants to seriously reduce our scary CO2 emissions, despite the fact that Asia is building 500 new coal plants this year alone? And 1000 more are planned. As a hypothetical guestimation, let's say Asia is building 20x Canada's coal CO2 emissions in one year, but Canadian politicians are zealous in thinking if we remove a fraction of ours, the world will somehow be saved? Nice math, earth hippies.

Only a gullible person doesn't think there's any other angles being played here. Once a person starts to suspect that the whole carbon thing may not really about global warming, then they start to open their eyes.

Image
Quote
User avatar
AJ Research Dept
Posts: 2881
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:14 am
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 2:47 am
While Canada's new PM is salivating about the new carbon treaty meeting in Paris, the new president of Poland just hints they will remove his country's participation in any such treaty

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/ ... onmentNews
Quote
PreviousNext

Return to It matters!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron