Criticism of Climate Change theory

Politics and religion.

Moderator: JasonNC

User avatar
AJ Research Dept
Posts: 2881
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:14 am
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 2:52 am
No global warming at all for 18 years 9 months – a new record – The Pause lengthens again – just in time for UN Summit in Paris

http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/04/ ... -in-paris/

Image

Image

Image
Quote
User avatar
AJ Research Dept
Posts: 2881
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:14 am
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2015 4:08 pm
NASA Scientists Have Known Since 1971 That CO2 Is Not Dangerous

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/201 ... tinuously/

In 1971, the top climatologists at NCAR and NASA reported that a runaway greenhouse effect is not possible, because the CO2 absorption spectra is nearly saturated already.

Image

Here is the full scientific paper:
http://vademecum.brandenberger.eu/pdf/k ... r_1971.pdf

Among other things, the paper uses mathematical models which suggest the following:

1. Humidity (water vapour) is much more of a greenhouse gas than CO2. An increase of CO2 by 8 times would only increase global air temps by less than 2 kelvins.
2. Dust and aerosols from human industrial emissions may actually lower global air temperatures (not significantly, but the worry was that increased use of fossil fuels in the future could lower the temps by 3.5 kelvin).

Like other scientific papers from the 70s, the authors are more concerned about falling global temperatures than global warming. It should be kept in mind that all climatology science papers, despite their excellence or deceptiveness, are imperfect and only represent educated guesses. A complete understanding of the climate, and our effect on it, does not seem to be in our grasp so far. More information and less bias should be the goal.
Quote
User avatar
AJ Research Dept
Posts: 2881
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:14 am
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2015 5:53 pm
Nobel Prize Winner Ivar Giaever vs Global Warming

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivar_Giaever
Quote
User avatar
AJ Research Dept
Posts: 2881
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:14 am
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2015 6:16 pm
Debunking the lie that 97% of scientists believe mankind is behind global warming

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100014240 ... 2813553136

http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein ... 100-wrong/

http://www.populartechnology.net/2014/1 ... ensus.html

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... ian-tuttle

http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall ... mpetition/


The following page has 97 Articles Refuting The ‘97% Consensus’ on global warming:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/12/19/9 ... l-warming/

Evidence of tampering with the 'consensus' figures:
http://business.financialpost.com/fp-co ... ate-change

The latest paper, by John Cook and colleagues, made an extraordinary impact, having been mentioned thousands of times on the internet within hours of its release, and being cited on President Obama’s Twitter feed and by the U.K.’s Energy and Climate Change Secretary, Ed Davey. The authors of the new paper are all associated with the activist website Skeptical Science, and it is therefore perhaps unsurprising that the paper was written with the express purpose of making a political impact.

We know this because a security lapse at the Skeptical Science website led to its private discussion forum being exposed to public view. Among the threads was one in which the protagonists revealed that the purpose of the research was to demonstrate an overwhelming consensus on climate change.


Image
Quote
User avatar
AJ Research Dept
Posts: 2881
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:14 am
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2015 6:45 pm
World-respected scientist Freeman Dyson vs global warming theory

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pou3sGedeK4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiKfWdXXfIs

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeman_Dyson

Dyson has had an impressive career. He has taught and performed research at some of the highest levels in science. He added climate studies to his many other interests in 1979.
Quote
User avatar
AJ Research Dept
Posts: 2881
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:14 am
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2015 3:01 pm
The French Société de Calcul Mathématique (Calculation Mathematical Society) has released a white paper this year on global warming -- just in time for the Paris Summit

"The battle against global warming: an absurd, costly and pointless crusade"

195 pages of analysis:
http://www.scmsa.eu/archives/SCM_RC_2015_08_24_EN.pdf

Naturally there's been zero mention of the paper in the global corporate news, despite the fact that these PHd mathematicians have done modeling work for the French government and other big entities. But some non-corporate fringe news groups have given the paper mention:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/bar ... nst-global

http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/envi ... ate-summit

http://morningmail.org/je-suis-societe- ... hematique/

"The world has been agape and agog at the trenchant no-nonsense call-a-spade-a-spade report by the Société de Calcul Mathématique de France – the SCM – on climate change and global warming."
Quote
User avatar
AJ Research Dept
Posts: 2881
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:14 am
PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2015 4:31 pm
The 16th to 18th centuries. Why was it so incredibly cold?

Image


1708. It was a particularly cold year in a long cold spell. Gabriele Bella (1733 -99) painted his vision of people cavorting on a frozen Venice lagoon in 1708:
Image

England was hard hit in what they called The Great Frost. The impact was greater in France where they called it Le Grand Hiver. Estimates place related deaths in France, mostly due to famine, to 600,000 by the end of 1710.

“Travelers died in the countryside, livestock in the stables, wild animals in the woods; nearly all the birds died, wine froze in barrels and public fires were lit to warm the poor,”


People across Europe awoke on 6 January 1709 to find the temperature had plummeted. A three-week freeze was followed by a brief thaw – and then the mercury plunged again and stayed there. From Scandinavia in the north to Italy in the south, and from Russia in the east to the west coast of France, everything turned to ice. The sea froze. Lakes and rivers froze, and the soil froze to a depth of a metre or more. Livestock died from cold in their barns, chicken’s combs froze and fell off, trees exploded and travellers froze to death on the roads. It was the coldest winter in 500 years.


IPCC and ‘hockey stick’ supporters attacked claims about the invalidity of their work saying the Medieval Warming Period and the Little Ice Age were, at best, regional. This was based partly on the fact that 7 C was the avg for the Northern Hemisphere. However, much historic evidence shows they were global. For example, in New York for April 5, 1709,

The cold is so intense that water thrown upon the ground at noon freezes immediately in NYC.


Notice the comment that “trees exploded”. What does it mean? Derham produced a summary later in the year when he wrote.

Fish froze in the rivers, game lay down in the fields and died, and small birds perished by the million. The loss of tender herbs and exotic fruit trees was no surprise, but even hardy native oaks and ash trees succumbed.


The Little Ice Age
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... e-ice-age/

Painting of the Thames River from 1677, heavily frozen

Image

Painting of the 'Frost Fairs' on the Thames in the late 17th century:
Image

Image

Ironically, National Geographic mentions that global warming will change the climate again, and suggests it is caused by human activity. So what caused the great cooling earlier?

Paintings of Holland when all the waterways froze solid for fifty winters straight:
http://www.nga.gov/exhibitions/2010/ave ... lideshow/#

Colf, or Dutch ice golf!
Image
Quote
User avatar
AJ Research Dept
Posts: 2881
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:14 am
PostPosted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 1:45 pm
Prominent Scientists Declare Climate Claims Ahead of UN Summit ‘Irrational’ – ‘Based On Nonsense’ – ‘Leading us down a false path’

http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/ ... alse-path/

MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen: 'Demonization of CO2 is irrational at best and even modest warming is mostly beneficial.' - 'When someone says this is the warmest temperature on record. What are they talking about? It’s just nonsense. This is a very tiny change period.'

Princeton Physicist Dr. Will Happer: 'Policies to slow CO2 emissions are really based on nonsense. We are being led down a false path. To call carbon dioxide a pollutant is really Orwellian. You are calling something a pollutant that we all produce. Where does that lead us eventually?'

Greenpeace Co-Founder Dr. Patrick Moore: 'We are dealing with pure political propaganda that has nothing to do with science.'


Image
Quote

Snarky!
Posts: 13692
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:01 pm
PostPosted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 10:38 am
Yet more explanation about the cooked books:

http://notrickszone.com/2015/11/20/germ ... Q5XTS.dpbs
Quote
User avatar
AJ Research Dept
Posts: 2881
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:14 am
PostPosted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 9:55 pm
That's a very good article, Heli

The Achilles Heel of global warming is the cynical, willful modification of data that was originally brought to light by the 'Russian hack'. God bless the Russians for consistently screwing up the Western elite plans.

Scientists cooked the books for years, and other scientists throughout the world are now taking serious notice.
Quote
PreviousNext

Return to It matters!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron